The Gilded Age of GPUs seems to be upon us in recent times, with exciting performance emanating from Nvidia, AMD, and soon-to-be Intel. Unfortunately, most of these releases also carry with them “Vanderbilt level” pricing, making even an oil tycoon blush. This has kept the excitement focused solely on high-end gaming enthusiasts. But wait, there’s more! Nvidia and AMD have finally released GPU options that supposedly cater to the entry level with the GeForce RTX 3050 and the Radeon RX 6500 XT, respectively.

We’re going to compare these GPUs based on pricing, availability, and performance. We’ll warn you beforehand though, this will be a bloody street-level fight, challenging what “entry level” and budget mean in 2022. The goal post has been moved—is simply being able to “buy” a GPU that’s available, enough to justify its existence? (For our guidance on graphics cards at every price point, see our complete roundup of the best GPUs for PC gaming.)

Nvidia RTX 3050 vs. AMD RX 6500 XT: Price

Nvidia’s RTX 3050 will lure you into a false sense of security with the $249 MSRP, as you’ll soon find them closer to $400 to $500 at most retailers. The AMD 6500 XT sounds friendly at $199, but most models will run you $269 to $299 with realistic pricing.

Yes, both are priced considerably more than their predecessors were. Both also will have sporadic pricing changes depending on the GPU market. This is what we’ve come to expect with the great GPU drought, but there is a key factor that explains the existence of these cards at their respective price levels.

Availability.

This one word dominates the landscape and dictates what options we have to choose from. On the Nvidia side, any RTX 3000 GPU seems to sell instantly—even when priced above its original MSRP. AMD pricing has also skyrocketed, leaving nothing on the table for the entry level.

The Nvidia RTX 3050 follows a more traditional path of pricing and availability: Everything tiers and scales as you’d expect in respect to the rest of the RTX 3000 lineup. Yes, it’s also capable of mining crypto currency, albeit not impressively, so that adds to the pricing pressure and lack of availability.

GeForce RTX 3050

Read our reviewPrice When Reviewed:$250Best Prices Today:$250 at EVGA | $279.99 at Amazon | $330 at Newegg

How about on the AMD side? The 6500 XT is in a category of its own entirely, with some hard performance sacrifices having been made with the goal of supplying more GPUs.

The Radeon RX 6500 XT and its pricing exist for one reason only: To have a GPU available for a somewhat reasonable price. It is not attractive to crypto miners, with only 4GB of VRAM, theoretically opening it up more for the gamer market too. Will the ends justify the means, however? Crypto miners won’t want it, but should gamers consider it? Let’s talk performance to better answer this question.

If you’ve ever seen the meme “This is fine,” where a dog seems content to be sitting in what is a hot, burning room—that’s the overall situation with graphics cards right now. Is it fine to be paying $300, $400, or even $500 for a 1080p level GPU in 2022? Not really.

RTX 3050 vs. 6500 XT: Performance

The genesis and “reason for existing” of the Radeon RX 6500 XT make it a non-suitable competitor for Nvidia’s GeForce RTX 3050. Yes, they both are entry-level recent releases, but the similarities stop there. The 6500 XT is competing more with its own ability to be purchased in the market rather than performance metrics. The RTX 3050 is a slimmed-down RTX 3060; the 6500 XT was not originally intended for the discrete GPU market in the same way, having originally been designed for laptops before the Great GPU Drought commenced. The 6500 XT has many compromises you should be aware of, such as only 4GB of VRAM, only two outputs for monitors, PCIe speed limits, etc. It also features a very small GPU die size, however which may aid production in greater numbers.

Let’s first discuss the RTX 3050, which is a competent 1080p-level GPU. It has 8GB of VRAM and allows for some advanced technology such as ray tracing to be utilized. It also retains all the great software Nvidia has developed for its GPUs, such as NVENC encoding, DLSS, etc.

Brad Chacos/IDG

Brad Chacos/IDG

Brad Chacos/IDG

Looking at performance data from Brad Chacos’s excellent review of the RTX 3050, we can see that it dominates the 6500 XT easily in Watch Dogs Legion—and pretty much every other title, especially with our maxed-our testing settings. The 6500 XT is more limited to the Medium or High level settings at most; “highest” and “ultra” are not part of its repertoire.

Brad Chacos/IDG

Brad Chacos/IDG

Brad Chacos/IDG

In Rainbow Six Siege, the performance difference is drastic and illustrates the massive gap in performance between the 6500 XT and everything else.

Interestingly enough, the step-up Radeon RX 6600 presents itself as a reasonable alternative to the RTX 3050. It’s more widely available, and generally within the price range of the RTX 3050 in retail. It’s certainly a more compelling performance option versus the 6500 XT. And better news—if you’re an owner of an AMD RX 5600 XT or RX 5700 from previous years, there’s no need to upgrade unless you take a leap to the Nvidia RTX 3060 level and beyond.

Brad Chacos/IDG

Brad Chacos/IDG

Brad Chacos/IDG

What if ray tracing is enabled? This is a notoriously punishing option, but the RTX 3050 surprisingly handles Shadow of the Tomb Raider competently. The 6500 XT with its many restrictions does not perform well here, as expected, but the RX 6600 once again shows promise.

Yes, the Radeon RX 6500 XT is technically the cheapest ray tracing capable GPU, but it’s not usable in a practical sense.

Keep in mind you may also want to enable Nvidia’s DLSS or AMD’s FSR technologies, which can give you a nice bump in performance in games that support it. (They were not active during these benchmarks in order to make the tests fair.)                            

Power and other things to know

The RTX 3050 doesn’t need a nuclear power plant to run, unlike its big brethren (I’m looking at you, RTX 3090). The AMD 6500 XT is even more efficient, so that means both are cooled easily and generally quiet.

Brad Chacos/IDG

Brad Chacos/IDG

Brad Chacos/IDG

The RTX 3050 will supply you with the Nvidia options and technologies you’re used to, but the 6500 XT has many more limitations that are uncommon.

First, you’ll be limited to just a single HDMI port and a single DisplayPort on the Radeon RX 6500 XT. You’ll also have only four PCIe lanes, and hampered performance on PCIe Gen 3 as a result. Most GPUs use 16 PCIe lanes as the norm. (Our Radeon RX 6500 XT review includes both PCIe 3.0 and PCIe 4.0 performance benchmarks at Medium graphics settings if you’d like to know more.) 4GB of VRAM and lack of any hardware encoders mean that this GPU is a no-go for content creators, too.  

The verdict of David vs. Goliath: Sorry, Goliath won

Radeon RX 6500 XT

Read our reviewPrice When Reviewed:$199Best Prices Today:$189 at B&H | $200 at Newegg

No sugar coating is necessary. Nvidia’s GeForce RTX 3050 is a far superior GPU to the Radeon RX 6500 XT on almost every single measurable metric. It’s like comparing Jupiter to Pluto. Sorry bud, you’re not a real planet.

Is the AMD RX 6500 XT a real GPU, though? Actually, it is. It’s not a very good one, but it does serve some purpose, for some people. Even considering that you’re more likely to find it for $250 to $300 instead of $199, there may be literally no other option until you get over $400. And even if you do, those options may not even be in stock at those prices.

Yes, the Radeon RX 6500 XT is controversial. But we must step away from the numbers and analyze more factors in the market and the real world.

Imagine this scenario: You’re building a PC but have a budget you’re sticking to. Your GPU option is either a $199 to $250 RX 6500 XT that’s in stock, or spending hundreds more on a highly inflated, but better-performing GPU (if you can even find it). Some people don’t want to double their GPU budgets, so the 6500 XT can be an option for them if they plan to stick to 1080p and Medium to High settings. It isn’t a complete potato, after all. It can run games at 1080p just fine if you’re careful about how hard you push it.

Thiago Trevisan/IDG

Thiago Trevisan/IDG

Thiago Trevisan/IDG

The RTX 3050 flew out of stock everywhere quickly, and it’s currently selling for over $400, much more than its ostensible $250 MSRP. The Radeon RX 6500 XT is still available, but also for $50 to $100 more than MSRP in most cases unless you can find a $199 unicorn.

If you can stretch your budget, the much more sensible solution that seems to have good stock would be stepping up to the AMD RX 6600 or 6600 XT. These are certainly much better than the 6500 XT, and in most scenarios surpass the RTX 3050. They can be found in the $400 to $550 range much more easily, certainly.

Still, for many people this still isn’t an option—going from $199 to over $400 is a considerable price hike. That’s why for a select group of people, the 6500 XT can tide them over until an upgrade is easier in the future. Unfortunately, it seems high GPU prices are here to stay for now, so upping one’s budget is needed.

The high-end GPU market may be in a Gilded Age in terms of performance, but the budget PC gaming market is in the dark age right now. If none of the above options make sense to you at their current prices, you’re not alone. The best advice for budget gamers may be this:

You can….”gasp”….just buy an Xbox Series S for $299 and get some pretty good gaming performance for the buck. Microsoft’s console is hands-down the best value for the dollar in today’s market. It’s still a PC technically too, right?

Author: Thiago Trevisan

Recent stories by Thiago Trevisan:

Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 vs. RTX 4080: Which 4K GPU should you buy?Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 vs. RTX 3080: Which should you buy?MSI MAG Z790 Tomahawk WiFi DDR4 review: Next-gen CPUs meet mainstream RAM